A Response from The Invisibles
Today I received an email, a response from The Invisibles, the anonymous authors of the letter that first circulated at AWP this past April. You can read more about that here. I know I’m not the only one who received this email, but I don’t know the extended list of recipients, and these are such necessary words I want them to be accessible to everyone and so will post the body of the email here. I cried when I was finished reading, because why is this so hard? It is so hard, to go on living and writing in this wasted landscape. I am perpetually exhausted. And I am so thankful for those who understand this and listen and care. Whoever you are/ wherever you are: thank you so much. You have given me strength. I support you.
“***TRIGGER WARNING for gendered violence, assault***
To our friends, allies, (fr)enemies and otherwise:
Our silence doesn’t represent absence. We’ve been silent not because we don’t exist, but because the thorough victim-blaming and protection of abusers in light of the original statement has been so sickening and triggering for us we had to retreat in order to recuperate, in order to survive. They might be asking, why now? Why after so long, especially when it seems a particular abuser has been revealed for who he really is? It would seem like due to recent events that this response has no purpose but now it is more crucial than ever to respond. This is not just about one abuser. This is about a culture of silencing. About those who are already nearly invisible in this “community”: people of color, queers, genderqueers, trans folks; anyone who falls outside the binary and gets left behind. The connection between those who silence, ignore, and question survivors and those who do whatever they can to protect their own and the legacies of whiteness is not arbitrary. We are watching.
People demand proof. They emphasize their own innocuous interactions with the accused as a sign of his innocence. They denigrate the character of those who speak out against sexual violence. They keep silent so as to remain on some neutral ground that does not exist. They ask the wrong questions, pointedly directing their dubiousness towards anyone but the accused.
When we realized that those who had stood with the survivors of the abuse and had made declarations of solidarity on social media, those who had run articles and think-pieces in light of the fractures within this poetry community, were receiving threats of legal action if they didn’t acquiesce to demands of censorship, we knew silence was not an option. We knew these were not “gentle letters.”
A survivor of one of the named abusers received graphic and specific death threats on an article, which included an image of our original statement. This is unacceptable. It is also unacceptable to chastise the “violent” rhetoric of certain outspoken survivors and turn a blind eye to violent, victim-shaming articles and blog posts written in defense of abusers, rife with expletives while referring to survivors and to The Invisibles as “indie terrorists.”
We came forward as an anonymous body, and people attacked our credibility, questioned our identities, our tactics, and our motives in lieu of engaging with the substance of our statement. To those who still question the legitimacy of our anonymity, the constant violence waged against us has completely proven its necessity. In a world where survivors have no voice, are routinely gas-lit and shamed, our so-called violent rhetoric clears a space for us to assert our presence. We are here. We exist. We matter.
If we came forward as ourselves, non-anonymously, people would viciously redouble their criticism, claiming we were the ones attacking an innocent party, us the villains and the person in question the true victim. This is not an exaggeration. We’ve left names out of this statement to legally protect the victims and survivors of misogynistic violence and avoid the lawsuit implicitly threatened by the cease & desist that other outspoken people have received. Don’t think this exemption will last forever, though. The names were a reminder to not forget the acts of violence that began to emerge and be socially recognized within the past year. They were also a warning to our peers.
The reaction to our first missive proves it: if you speak up against sexual violence in this community, you will be actively silenced by those who hold power. If you dare to say or even repeat the names of those accused, you will be served with legal intimidation in the form of a cease and desist. These are the affordances of a man with power: to wipe the slate clean, to scare into silence those who have nothing to do with The Invisibles but have spoken out against sexual violence. If you’re a “feminist” why would you uphold the privilege of men in power? How long will women have to bow down in hopes of recognition? Who asked men to do “feminist” work? Why does the “community” value it? Despite all of these months the response is still the same. Nothing has changed except an open understanding that this is only the tip of the iceberg. How this is so much more than rape culture. How deep the disbelief, the defense, the shaming goes. We understand that this is war.
Scores of people wield their concern for the accused and titillate over how terrible it all is. Hardly anyone has said: how terrible it is that the only recourse to a modicum of relief is to say a single name from the safety of anonymity. Few have emphasized how terrible it is to be relentlessly attacked and doubted when one comes out with allegations of wrongdoing, however anonymous, however imprecise. Why does the accused get the benefit of the doubt while the burden of proof falls unduly on survivors’ shoulders? Why are people so quick to jump to someone’s defense when it is merely suggested that they have abused their power and harmed others? It is all too clear where their priorities are.
For those confused about the “actual accusations” being levied, you must understand this desire for “clarity” is not a desire for truth or knowledge; it is a desire for information so they can play detective. The punitive and juridical logic of the courts rises to the tops of everyone’s consciousness in times of moral panic when social capital is at stake. We repeat ourselves: this is not about any single person, nor about enforcing a carceral feminism. This is about a culture that underwrites and sustains emotional and physical patriarchal violence. Even for those who believe in the state’s hegemony over “truth,” you are still at a loss. Sexual assault is one of the most under-reported crimes, with 68% still being left unreported. Only about 2% of all rape and related sex charges are false. For those in doubt, the court is not a viable site of resistance as it is more likely to protect those in power rather than those who are most vulnerable.
It’s time to take the lurid spotlight off of abusers. We need to refocus ourselves on the needs of survivors and work on creating safer spaces that don’t reinforce our broken power structures. And that starts with listening to us when we speak out—even anonymously—and believing us. The literary community and self-proclaimed feminists within it need to stop blaming, censoring, and shaming survivors or being too afraid to give support. This “community” is fractured. This abuse and the fear tactics need to be exposed so that we can collectively recognize this pain and work towards building a possible future we would want to live in. Just because survivors choose anonymity as their platform does not mean they are terrorists or liars or people with an “agenda” to take down or destroy publishers or presses.
While you squabble over our tone and our tactics, survivors spend their nights reliving trauma and seeking refuge in a world where precious little exists. This may not be how you personally envisioned misogynistic violence falling, but this is only one of many tactics we have chosen to proceed with. Deal with it. You feel uncomfortable with our methods; we refuse to apologize for your discomfort in the face of ongoing misogyny, violence, and silencing. All survivors, we believe you unequivocally and support and stand with you. We are The Invisibles, and we will not be intimidated into silence.”
“Every time I speak up about misogyny in the lit world, I am met with resistance, as if it’s merely a matter of personal opinion that violence against women is a global epidemic, as if it’s merely a matter of personal opinion that one in four women will experience sexual violence in her lifetime, that one in five women will experience rape, that I can’t think of a single non-male person in my life who hasn’t been subjected to male violence in one way or another.”
By Amorak Huey
It’s tempting to start this piece by repeating the obvious, only speaking slowly: Don’t. Write. Literature. That. Is. Misogynist. Because, seriously. It’s not that hard….
“But was the Alt Lit community’s response to vocal non-men fundamentally different than Gamergate’s? I put the question to Sarah Certa, Jos Charles, Kat Dixon, D. Dragonetti, Kia Groom, and Alexandra Naughton, a group of editors and writers who are neck-deep (or deeper) in the war against the patriarchy. I put my question to the group: how do these two battles against the patriarchy compare? In our conversation, we explore the explicit violence of Gamergate and the implicit violence lurking behind the treatment of rape victims and perpetrators in the Alt Lit community, discuss rape culture’s silencing of victims, and bemoan the codependent relationship between capitalism and the patriarchy. And what we find is that the cost of pushing these issues into the spotlight is the emotional—and physical—safety of those who speak out.”
Fifty Shades of Grey & The Domestic Violence Shelter I’m Sending My Ten Dollars To
It’s the day before Valentine’s Day and for the fourth day in a row this week I’ve woken up with chest pains. Maybe it has something to do with the fact that I still sleep in the bed where he raped me, in the apartment where so much of the abuse happened. I only got the apartment when I did because he wanted to visit me so badly. It was good for me to move out of my parents’ house (my father’s continued emotional and psychological abuse was making me ill), but traumatic memories have a way of lingering. They are in every shadow. I hope to have the means to move away soon.
But it’s not just my personal trauma that gives me chest pains – it’s also the trauma that’s happening in the world, every day, all day, the sexism, the racism, the transphobia, the classism, the ableism, the empathy-deficit that is so strong I can’t help but think it will destroy the planet long before any bursting sun or meteor will.
And today is the opening day of the movie Fifty Shades of Grey. I haven’t read the book and don’t plan to. I don’t need to read it to know what it’s about. I don’t need to see the movie. I know what emotional and sexual abuse look like. I know what they feel like. I know all the signs. I am still living in the aftermath.
Instead I’ve read many of the articles that dissect the story, and from what I’ve gathered there doesn’t even seem to be much dispute about whether or not the relationship between Christian Grey and Anastasia Steele is abusive, but whether or not that matters. Women like this book – that is, after all, how it sold so many copies – so it can’t be problematic, right? It’s just a book. It’s not real.
But it’s because women like this book that it’s so problematic. The fact that women find this book sexually liberating is so problematic it makes me dizzy. And not because women shouldn’t have sexual agency but because we already so gravely don't and Fifty Shades only reinforces mainstream sexual violence, i.e. heteronormative male sexuality, i.e. that’s why it’s so popular. If the movie was sexually groundbreaking it wouldn’t be opening at $60 million. If the book was sexually groundbreaking it wouldn’t be mainstream. Misogynist beliefs about sex and sexuality are too deeply ingrained in ourselves and our society for millions of women to suddenly become liberated by a story that people around the world recognize as abusive. And I know this attitude can sound patronizing, and I cringe at that, but that’s also because of the nature of abuse – it’s designed to look like something other than abuse, especially in the beginning. Abuse is designed to make you think you like it. And when you don’t like it, abuse is designed to make you think it’s your fault. Something must be wrong with you. What the fuck is wrong with you, he said… Abuse is abuse because it denies the victim agency to fully recognize that what’s happening is abuse.
I was with my abuser when several of his other victims came forward about his abuse. I wasn’t shocked at their stories (which should have been shocking to me, in the moment), but I felt patronized when anyone tried to tell me I was being abused, and I think that’s because victims are already denied so much agency – by that point my entire life was being dictated by him, his wants, his needs, his moods – that I couldn’t stand yet another person trying to dictate my reality. And besides, listening to those other voices, believing them, would mean I’d have to face reality, to face the real him, but he’d already stripped away so much of my personhood that I didn’t have an “I” with which to face him. I was a nobody. Just a body. And he loved that body. He loved that body more than I had ever loved that body, and, growing up being shamed for my body – by both my father (“hey there, fatty,” “hey there, bubble-butt”), and body-critical American culture, it felt good, for once, to not be ashamed of my body, even though I was depressed, even though he was mean to me, even though I was scared of him, even though he wouldn’t take no for an answer –at least I was sexy as fuck, and I took this distorted thinking as some sort of liberation, some sort of power, when really that was exactly how he wanted me to feel – liberated, beautiful, not abused.
My psuedo-liberation was a product of his emotional and sexual abuse and only reinforced his control over me. He didn’t love my body – he loved using my body. And he damn did he use it up. If I hated it before I don’t know what to call my relationship with it now. There isn’t one. Numbness.
Patriarchy at large functions in much the same way – it denies its own existence through pseudo-liberation of marginalized groups, i.e. claiming that something like Fifty Shades is all about giving women permission to openly talk about sex and is therefore progressive, when what it’s actually doing is further normalizing male narratives of sexual violence, which in turn only reinforces the power of those already in power, i.e. not women.
And it’s not “just a book.” What is “just a book,” anyway? We shape our reality through language and stories. Language and stories reinforce our attitudes and beliefs about the world. No book is “just a book.” No movie is “just a movie."
Part of me wishes I was able to read the book myself and draw more specific connections between Christian Grey and my abuser, the similarities and differences between them and how both are important to note – no two abusers are exactly the same, especially since many are very skilled at adapting their tactics to the personality and environment of the victim – but the foundation is the same – manipulation, control, confusion, fear, all wrapped up in a big red bow labeled LOVE.
A year ago on Valentine’s Day I remember fantasizing about telling someone that my fiancee was abusing me. But am I being abused? I asked myself this so many times, entirely oblivious to the fact that the answer to my question lay in my need to ask it so many times.
A year ago I was at work, not at all excited for Valentine’s Day. I thought, How could all this rage be love? I was scared to go home, to this apartment. But I went because there was nowhere else to go, and there he was, all showered and clean, with a bottle of champagne and a several-hundred dollar diamond bracelet he’d spent the day searching for at the Mall of America, a handwritten card he’d diligently worked on at the coffee shop.
I am so in love with you I am so in love with you I am so in love with you
Over and over I read the card. It was like water in the desert – I was thirsting for affection, romance, emotional intimacy – signs of all the things that had led me here in the first place, signs that I wasn’t crazy, that I wasn’t being abused, that everything would be okay…
Fifty Shades of Grey is and will continue to be popular and there’s not much I can do about that. Women around the world are and will continue to be abused at alarmingly high rates, and there’s not much I can do about that either. But I’ll keep writing when I can, I’ll keep supporting other victims, and instead of seeing Fifty Shades of Grey I’m going to donate the ten dollars a movie ticket would cost me to The Domestic Violence Relief Fund. I hope you’ll consider doing the same.
P.S. a few months later I burned that fucking card.
Violence against women is a global epidemic. When we come across violence against women in literature and art, it’s not the content that is the problem but who is saying it, how, and why they are saying it. I am all for survivors of abuse reclaiming those narratives through art. We need to reclaim those narratives. We need to reshape our realities.
And this need is exactly why it’s such a problem that men continue to aestheticize images of violence against women, and especially when they do so without explicit context, and especially when editors and readers treat this aestheticization as something deserving of a platform. This doesnothing but give agency to misogynistic tropes and thus further silences the voices of those who already have to struggle so hard to be heard. It’s not a man’s job to articulate these narratives, and women are not objects to be torn apart for the aesthetic factor of a man’s “art.” It’s not cool. It’s not edgy. It’s fucking disgusting, and it’s fucking disgusting that I have to point out that it’s fucking disgusting.
I know a lot of people are saying this has been an awful week for the writing community AND IT HAS in terms of the issues we’ve been discussing but for me personally I’ve never felt more sane and validated and unsurprised – like, this toxicity is what I deal with almost constantly in terms of flashbacks, processing, memories, AND private conversations with so many of my girlfriends, both in and out of the writing community, who have endured similar abuse. And it’s not because we’re obsessing or “choosing to focus on the negative.” This is reality right now. Internet breaks are healthy but this week feels more like reality surfacing than anything else. This week feels like the truest week I’ve had in a long time. Like all my private thoughts and conversations are suddenly public. It’s exhausting and exhilarating. If someone wants to come over for a dance party and/or cigarettes later that’d be cool.